![]() ![]() |
This source, visible in the 327-MHz GMRT image as well as in the
1420-MHz NVSS image (Fig. 6.6), coincides with a an
UC H II region G004.4170.126 (Becker et al.1994) (classified on
the basis of its high frequency flux densities and IR colour selection
criteria (Wood & Churchwell1989b; Wood & Churchwell1989a)). Images of
this source at 327 MHz from the GMRT and 1420 MHz from the NVSS
presented here are the first resolved images of this source. The
extended emission around a compact core seen these images is similar
to that detected for other UC H II regions using the VLA in D-array
configuration (Kim & Koo2001; Kurtz et al.1999).
The peak flux densities measured at 327 and 1420 MHz, from images
smoothed to the same resolution, are 0.49 and 0.51 Jy respectively.
The spectral index between 327 and 1420 MHz corresponding to these
values is close to zero and is consistent with this being a flat
spectrum thermal source.
The integrated flux densities from the 5 and 1.4 GHz Galactic plane
surveys (Becker et al.1994) however corresponds to a negative
spectral index between 5 and 1.4 GHz (the 1.4 GHz flux density from
their measurement is in fact underestimated due to missing flux for
sources larger than 120 arcmin; inclusion of the missing flux will
make the spectral index more negative). Cuts taken across the
spectral index map made using the images at 327 and 1400 MHz are shown
in Fig.6.7. The spectral index of the compact core
is reasonably flat between 1.4 GHz and 327 MHz. Here also, away from
the core, the spectral index is negative, indicative of non-thermal
component of emission (neither of these images suffer from missing
flux). The average spectral index measured from the resolved images
at these frequencies also show a gradient from nearly zero for the
core to for the nebula.
![]() |
In the far infrared colour-colour plot of
vs.
(Wood & Churchwell1989a),
UC H II regions are concentrated in the upper left quadrant of the
plot (around
and
). The IRAS flux densities
for this source are 16.07, 132.7, 1010 and 2748 Jy at 12, 25, 60 and
100
m respectively (Becker et al.1994). On the IR
colour-colour plot, this source lies at
and
, which
indicates that this is an UC H II region. H85
RRL transition
at
km sec
has also been detected towards this
direction (Lockman1989). This puts a lower limit on the linear
size of a few pc corresponding to the observed angular size of
arcmin and a distance corresponding to systemic velocity of
the RRL towards this source. Again, this is large compared to the
typical size for the UC H II regions (
pc). EM of
pc cm
for this source, using the peak flux
density at 5 GHz and assuming
filling the resolution
element, is consistent with this source being a UC H II region
(Wood & Churchwell1989b).
Recent detection of associated extended emission around many of the so called UC H II regions (Kim & Koo2001; Koo et al.1996; Kurtz et al.1999) is on a similar scale as the extended emission seen for this source. The extended emission seen in the 327 and 1400-MHz images is therefore not surprising; the advantage of high resolution provided by the GMRT simultaneously with sensitivity to large angular scales is apparent. However, it is unclear what ramifications this extended emission might have on the models that attempt to explain the morphology of UC H II regions (Kurtz2000). Scaled versions of current models are unlikely to explain the emission at arcmin scales. Similarly, the spectral index variation across the source (from the compact core to the extended component) is harder to explain.
![]() |
Two UC H II regions, namely G003.3490.076 and G003.351
0.077
(Becker et al.1994) lie at the edge of the field containing the
barrel shaped SNR G003.6
0.2. The location of these objects
coincides with the northern most compact peak of emission in the
sub-image of this region shown in Fig. 6.8. Extended
emission in the immediate vicinity of these compact sources on the
scale of several arc-seconds to several arc-minutes is also clearly
visible in this image. The quality of the image for this region is,
however, not very good, possibly due to primary beam attenuation as
well as due to antenna tracking errors on some of the antennas due to
which sources on the edge of the beams suffer from effective
differential short time scale gain changes. The precise morphology of
this extended emission as well as the flux density of this emission,
therefore, cannot be reliably determined from this image. High
resolution observations, centred on this region at a few frequencies,
using the GMRT will be required to determine the nature of this
extended emission.