From gtaylor@dhcp1-5.aoc.nrao.edu Mon May  1 12:04:02 2000
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:27:23 -0600
From: Greg Taylor <gtaylor@dhcp1-5.aoc.nrao.edu>
To: tcornwel@cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Cc: akemball@cv3.cv.nrao.edu, gtaylor@cv3.cv.nrao.edu, smyers@cv3.cv.nrao.edu
Subject: testing aips++ log of April 27

  
               Testing AIPS++  Detailed Log

April 27, 2000, session:

note: TTT = trouble
      BBB = bug
      QQQ = question

Decided to start the calibration over since some sources didn't look
like they had been properly calibrated.

Starting from scratch I ran through the calibration in a couple hours
with no major problems.  Only problem was I couldn't remember the
syntax Tim C. used to apply a uv-range selection on just 3C286.  So I
just used all the data.  Solutions look reasonable, but the flux scale
is a bit off.  Worse is that the FG table was not applied so there is
still a lot of bad data.

I need to apply the flags from editing in AIPS and start over. 

I applied the FG table in AIPS and then ran UVCOP for good
measure.  Started over (play it again Sam) and ran through
the calibration.  Everything looked fine (flux densities,
solutions, etc) until I look at the corrected data in visplot.
All garbage.  Don't know what went wrong.  Find Athol on 
Monday.

--- end of testing.  
Frustration meter
reads: |*******            |
        low            high