Memorandum to EVLA/VLBA Proposers and Observers
News
-
- General announcements and news for investigators
proposing to use the EVLA, VLBA, HSA, and other VLBI facilities for
the 2011 August 1 deadline will be available in a forthcoming eNews
issue. EVLA configuration plans are available
here.
Current Regular and Large Proposals
- General
- Information about the status of all
current proposals on which your name appears has been e-mailed to you,
in a format described under Static Information below. That e-mailing
(a) includes proposals just considered for trimester 2011a plus those
waiting for future semesters, whatever their date of submission; and
(b) does not include proposals submitted earlier that are waiting in
the dynamic scheduling queues.
- EVLA Scheduling
- This can take two forms, dynamic and
fixed date. Rare proposals, particularly those requiring coordination
with other facilities, will be scheduled on fixed dates with
notification to the observers about six weeks in advance. Most
approved proposals will be accepted for insertion into the EVLA
dynamic scheduling queue. Starting in trimester 2011a, dynamic
allocations are based on two priorities. First, a scientific priority
in the range 0 (highest) through 9 (lowest) is assigned to the
proposal. Then, taking into account the time available, this is
converted to an observational priority according to the likelihood
that an observation will occur (A = will almost certainly be observed;
B = will likely be observed; C = might be observed; D = filler, or
unlikely to be observed).
- EVLA Statistics
- There were 149 active EVLA proposals
for trimester 2011a. We approved 62 for insertion into the EVLA
dynamic queue, with 38 at observational priority A, 6 at observational
priority B, 10 at observational priority C, and 8 at observational
priority D. There are 11 proposals waiting to trigger on an impending
event (9 held over from previous trimesters, 2 new). We approved 8
proposals for 74 MHz observations, which will occur on fixed dates in
the B, BnA, and A configurations. We approved three other proposals
for fixed date observations in the A configuration. For trimester
2011a, the ratio of the total time requested to the total time
available was 2.0. A forthcoming eNews article will include
information about approved proposals.
- EVLA Dynamic Queue
- To gauge the pressure on dynamic
time as a function of EVLA LST, consult the pressure histogram below
for the A configuration from June 10 to September 12. This histogram
for trimester 2011a excludes triggered transient proposals. The
histogram encodes pressure by observational priority A through D, as
well as by frequencies above 10 GHz (crosshatched) and below 10 GHz
(clear). The time available per LST hour is shown by the thick black
line. The EVLA is oversubscribed at most LSTs. Engineering and
commissioning activities, plus approved fixed-date proposals, cause
the thick black line to be less than the total number of LST days in
the configuration. Moreover, engineering and commissioning activities
dominately occur during daytime, causing the thick black line to dip
severely near 10 hours LST. OSRO restrictions are evolving with time,
so we recommend that trimester 2011a observers wait until May to
prepare their scheduling blocks. We also remind observers of the
shared-risk nature of early science with the EVLA during trimester
2011a.
- VLBA Scheduling
- This can take two forms, dynamic and
fixed date. Most approved proposals will be accepted for insertion
into the VLBA dynamic scheduling queue. The dynamic allocation is
described by a scientific priority in the range 1 (highest) through 3
(lowest). A
Guide to VLBA Dynamic Scheduling is available. Rare proposals,
particularly those requiring other resources such as a non-VLBA
antenna, will be scheduled on fixed dates with notification to the
observers about six weeks in advance.
- VLBA Statistics
- There were 38 active VLBA proposals
for trimester 2011a. We approved 14 proposals for insertion into the
VLBA dynamic queue. Two proposals were approved for fixed date
scheduling. We rejected 13 proposals. We have approved three large,
multi-trimester proposals, totalling 1026 hours; eleven others
totalling 675 hours; and have arranged a very low priority filler
project to use otherwise unusable time. There were 3274 hours
requested. There were four new proposals for EVN/Global VLBI, and six
new proposals for the Global Millimeter VLBI Array. A forthcoming
eNews article will include information about approved proposals.
- VLBA Dynamic Queue
- This is generally oversubscribed.
Trimester 2011a begins in mid-January and ends in mid-May. It is in
the observers' interests to submit their key files early in the
trimester.
Related Postings
-
- Information from the EVLA/VLBA
Scheduling Officers is available. Postings for the
trimester-based era include the NRAO Proposal Referees'
Guide, a complete description of the
EVLA/VLBA Time Allocation Process, and the proposal process for Rapid
Response Science. Revised postings for the semester-based era will
be available early in 2011.
Static Information
- Proposal Summary
- The first line contains the
proposal's code and legacy ID. The second line contains the proposal's
title. The next few lines inform you of the proposal's status. This
is followed by comments from the RSRO/ECSO Review (if applicable) and
from the EVLA/VLBA Proposal Selection Committee. The authors of the
proposal are then listed. For proposals for which we have allocated
EVLA or VLBA time, a summary of this time appears. We also list the
times requested in the proposal. The reports from the referees follow
and they contain a numerical rating. The referees use any numerical
system with which they are comfortable, subject only to the convention
that the smaller the rating, the better the proposal. We include the
median of the ratings given us by that particular referee in order to
judge the relative rating of your proposal. The referee ratings are
strongly advisory to the Committee, which, however, may also apply
considerations of similar archival observations, logistics, resources
used, etc., to decide which proposals to approve. Some referees also
provide a value for a percent of time recommended, in comparison to
the time requested in the proposal.
- VLBI Global Network Proposals
- NRAO evaluates these
but the final choice of proposals for scheduling, for either the
centimeter or the 3mm sessions, is done by negotiation between the US
and European schedulers.
- Modifications
- Unless stated otherwise, any time
allocated is only for the proposal given, and no substantial
modification in the program should be made without consulting with
schedsoc@nrao.edu (and R. Porcas for VLBI Global Network proposals)
before doing so.
- Public Outreach
- The NRAO can help observers and their
home institution prepare joint press releases, and/or help prepare
enhanced graphics for publications. The NRAO encourages observers to
submit images from their research to its on-line image
gallery. Contact: mtadams@nrao.edu.
Page maintained by schedsoc for the EVLA/VLBA Proposal Selection
Committee: R. Dickman (NRAO), B. Clark (NRAO), M. Claussen (NRAO),
D. Frail (NRAO), D. Hough (Trinity), D. Hunter (Lowell), S. Kurtz
(UNAM), Y. Pihlstrom (UNM), A. Sarma (DePaul U), S. White (Kirtland),
J. Wrobel (NRAO), M. Yun (U Mass)
Modified on Wednesday, 18-May-2011 14:05:06 MDT
|