Memorandum to VLA/VLBA Proposers and Observers
News
-
- General announcements and news for investigators
proposing to use the VLA, VLBA, HSA, and other VLBI facilities for the
2009 October 1 deadline will be available in
mid-September. Some basic information concerning the October 1
proposal deadline is already available.
Current Regular and Large Proposals
- General
- Information about the status of all
current proposals on which your name appears has been e-mailed to you,
in a format described under Static Information below. That e-mailing
(a) includes proposals just considered for trimester 2009-T3 plus
those waiting for future trimesters, whatever their date of
submission; and (b) does not include proposals submitted earlier that
are waiting in the dynamic scheduling queues or multi-configuration
VLA proposals for which time in the DnC, D, or subsequent
configurations has been previously allocated.
- VLA Scheduling
- This takes two forms, fixed date and
dynamic. Some approved proposals will be scheduled on fixed dates;
time for them was allocated for the DnC configuration (September 25 to
October 12), for the D configuration (October 16 to January 11), or
for the associated reconfigurations (September 14-25, October 12-16).
Some approved proposals have been accepted for insertion into the VLA
dynamic scheduling queue; a Guide to VLA
Dynamic Scheduling is available, including descriptions of new
dynamic parameters related to monitoring or survey observations.
Proposals requesting future configurations in some cases have been
allocated time in those configurations, and in other cases have been
retained for future consideration. We rejected proposals which we
were unable to schedule or unwilling to queue, and which required only
the DnC or D configurations. We also, in most cases, rejected
unscheduled proposals which were submitted more than one year ago, or
for which it is clear, due to referee ratings or other reasons, that
the proposal will not be accepted within one year from its submission
date.
- VLA Statistics
- The oversubscription rate for the D
configuration was about 2.3 after subtracting time allocated to
maintenance and software development, and subtracting time previously
allocated as part of a multiconfiguration proposal. The
oversubscription was heavily concentrated at 12h LST, with a secondary
peak at 18h. There were 93 active VLA proposals. We allocated time
for 31 VLA proposals, accepted eight as target of opportunity
proposals waiting for an event of known type, approved 26 for
insertion into the VLA dynamic queue, and rejected 27 proposals. The
average time per approved proposal was 29 hours for the VLA (23 hours
excluding four Large proposals). Information from the
VLA/VLBA Scheduling Officers includes a table of approved VLA/VLBA
proposals.
- VLBA Scheduling
- This takes two forms, dynamic and
fixed date. Most approved proposals have been accepted for insertion
into the VLBA dynamic scheduling queue; a Guide to VLBA
Dynamic Scheduling is available. Rare proposals, particularly
those requiring other resources such as a non-VLBA antenna, will be
scheduled on fixed dates with notification to the observers about six
weeks in advance.
- VLBA Statistics
- There were 1292 hours requested for
the High Sensitivity Array (HSA). There were 9802 hours requested for
the VLBA, 6721 hours at 256 Mbits/sec or lower (the standard recording
rate), 3081 hours at 512 Mbits/sec (the current maximum rate). For
comparison, in a recent trimester, the VLBA observed 1350 hours.
There were 45 active VLBA proposals and four new Global Network
proposals. We approved five VLBA proposals for fixed time scheduling,
four for the HSA. We approved 16 VLBA proposals for the dynamic
queue, four at high priority, 11 at second priority, one at low
priority. We rejected 19 VLBA proposals. The average time per
approved proposal was 68 hours for the VLBA (32 hours excluding four
Large proposals).
Information from the VLA/VLBA Scheduling Officers includes a table
of approved VLA/VLBA proposals.
Related Postings
-
- These include the
NRAO Proposal Referees' Guide, a complete description of the
VLA/VLBA Time Allocation Process, and the proposal process for Rapid Response
Science.
Static Information
- Proposal Summary
- The first line contains the
proposal code and title. The second line informs you if we have
scheduled time for the proposal, and whether it will be considered for
more time in the future. If you expected the proposal to be
considered for a future trimester, and this is not indicated in this
line, please let us know by the next proposal deadline. This line is
followed by comments from the VLA/VLBA Proposal Selection Committee,
or from other considerations of the proposal, and then the list of
authors of the proposal. For proposals for which we have allocated
VLA or VLBA time, a list of the times tentatively allocated, with
configuration, and a breakdown in terms of sessions with approximate
centering in VLA sidereal time is given. We also list the times
requested, with a similar breakdown, and times previously
scheduled.
The reports from the referees follow and they contain a numerical
rating. The referees use any numerical system with which they are
comfortable, subject only to the convention that the smaller the
rating, the better the proposal. We include the median of the ratings
given us by that particular referee in order to judge the relative
rating of your proposal. The referee ratings are strongly advisory to
the Committee, which, however, may also apply considerations of
similar archival observations, logistics, resources used, etc., to
decide which proposals to schedule.
For most proposals that supplied a source list we have searched the
VLA or VLBA archive for previous observations of the same sources,
except for the Galactic Center and Orion A in which the listings would
be too voluminous to be very informative. We include this listing in
the e-mailing sent to the lead proposer only. These listings give the
name, position, type of observation (blank indicates continuum, codes
starting with a number are line modes, VLBA observations show
recording mode), frequency of observation, bandwidth, time on source
in minutes, number of antennas, proposal code, observer's name,
configuration and date. Observations are selected on the basis of
positional agreement only. We include this information since it may
be of value to the proposer, as it often was to the Committee in
evaluating the proposal.
- VLBI Global Network Proposals
- NRAO evaluates these
but the final choice of proposals for scheduling, for either the
centimeter or the 3mm sessions, is done by negotiation between the US
and European schedulers.
- Modifications
- Unless stated otherwise, any time
allocated is only for the proposal given, and no substantial
modification in the program should be made without consulting with
schedsoc@nrao.edu (and R. Porcas for VLBI Global Network proposals)
before doing so.
- Public Outreach
- The NRAO can help observers and their
home institution prepare joint press releases, and/or help prepare
enhanced graphics for publications. The NRAO encourages observers to
submit images from their research to its on-line image
gallery. Contact: mtadams@nrao.edu.
Page maintained by schedsoc for the VLA/VLBA Proposal Selection
Committee: R. Dickman (NRAO), A. Brown (U of Colorado), C. Chandler
(NRAO), B. Clark (NRAO), M. Claussen (NRAO), M. Elvis
(Harvard-Smithsonian CfA), S. Kurtz (UNAM), A. Sarma (DePaul U),
R. Taylor (U of Calgary), N. Vogt (New Mexico State U), J. Wrobel
(NRAO), M. Yun (U Mass), R. Zavala (USNO)
Modified on Tuesday, 01-Sep-2009 09:10:02 MDT
|