First time I've seen "La Traviata." I've never been much attracted to whores with a heart of gold (Though I suppose this could have been a better class of people in the 19th century). And that goes double for whores with hearts of gold who are dying of tuberculosis. I suppose if they were dying of syphilis they would be somewhat more interesting. And given the literary conventions of the day, their real-life models may have been - in literature the whores were dropping like flies from tuberculosis, but only males were going mad, cursing God, and dying of syphilis, which seems unlikely from an epidemiological point of view. Anyway, I found myself more interested in Germont, Alfredo's father, than in the two lovers. I can't quite put myself in his place and make it work. Oh sure, I could picture in myself the degree of parental certainty in the efficacy of a more normal lifestyle in promoting happiness that leads him to put his two cents in toward destroying the present happiness of Alfredo and Violetta. The thing I can't picture is that he tackles the problem by interviewing the live-in whore. I can only picture myself talking to the errant child himself. But perhaps Germont (or Verdi) has a more realistic picture of probable results. He actually succeeds in convincing Violetta that she is bad for Alfredo, and should get out of his life because she loves him. Whereas the outcome of an interview between me and an erring child would be that said child would become incensed at the interference, tell me to go to Hell, and both of us would go away feeling just awful, but there would be no change in actual behavior. (Isn't that the way families are supposed to work?) Anyway, it is clear that Germont loves his son, cares greatly what happened to him, and is only attempting to destroy his life out of the purest motives. As for Violetta and Alfredo themselves, they are a pair of jejune, idiotic hotheads who aren't very good at communicating with each other. Borrrriiinng. The only interest there was that Violetta had such a strong and vivacious soprano, that I kept wondering if she would be able to perish believably in the last act. She managed to make it fairly convincing by dropping in the occasional spoken line, as if too debilitated to sing. The singing voice remained strong and vibrant to the end. (And Germont was there to bid her adieu.)