Memo Review
Memo: 423 - The Vane Calibration System Revisited
Guilloteau, 2002May27
Reviewer: Jesus-Martin Pintado
Date Received: 2003Feb07
Review:
This memo shows the implications of the expected saturation of the ALMA
receivers on the accuracy of the semi-transparent (S/T) vane calibration
scheme. It is shown that achieving 1% accuracy in the calibration
requires the use of two different vanes. One optimized for 86 GHz and
the other for 280 GHz. The memo also shows the advantages of adding an
ambient load which allows to estimate the degree of saturation of the
receivers and to correct for the effects of possible saturation on the
S/T vane.
General comment
The memo clearly shows that achieving 1% accuracy is very challenging.
The memo addresses the effects of mixer saturation and its implications.
For completeness, it would be useful to include other possible effects
like the gain compression in the IF amplifier chain. What is the present
specification for the IF gain compression?.
Section 1
I am a bit confused with Fig. 1. Trec SSB is a factor of 2 larger than
DSB, but (in Fig. 1) Tan (Trec+Jsky) in SSB is only 1.4 time larger than
in DSB.
Section 2
In page 4, it is motioned that compression in the IF chain is not
considered. As mentioned before, it might be quite useful to include at
least the baseline specification for the IF gain compression.
Section 3
3.1
After the equations of the semitransparent vane it would be useful to
define 1-f as the transmission coefficient of the vane.
I suggest to suppress Fig 3 (referred in the text as Fig. 3.1 ) since it
is clearly explained in the text.
3.2
It is unclear to me what on-time fraction means in Figs 4 and 5 bottom.
All the calculations are made for a S/T vane absorption coefficient
proportional to the frequency. However, most of the materials measured,
so far, seem to show an absorption coefficient proportional to the
frequency to the 1.5. It might be useful to consider also this case to
specify the optimum number of S/T vanes the their transmission
coefficients.
Conclusions
End of page 12. This is the first time that it is mentioned that the
nature of the losses in the S/T vane calibration scheme might be of
importance to achieve the 1% calibration accuracy. It might be
interesting to mention this assumption at the beginning of section 1.
It is also suggested that 1% calibration accuracy in Band 7 is difficult
to achieve. Since this has important implications it might also appears
in the Abstract.
Minor
Last line in Page 2 say "measure by the correlator" -> "measure on the
source by the correlator"
Fig2. figure caption "function for frequency" -> "function of frequency"