[an error occurred while processing this directive]
This is the text of an email from Rick Perley on 23 December 1998. "Jim" is Jim Condon.
Jim and I see this issue from the same angle -- the confusion limit is defined by the r.m.s. rumble in an image, caused by the response to background sources in the beam, and from the uncleaned sidelobes of sources outside the imaged area. However, this definition does not lead to a clear prediction of the confusion limit, as the slope of the differential number count is not steep enough to prevent the calculated answer being set solely by the (single) strongest source in the sky. Even if we argue that the strongest sources are all heavily resolved, so that the number count will 'dive' at the upper end, we will still be left with the rms confusion noise being set by the few strongest, unresolved, objects. Failing a good, simple statistic, we fall back to real observations, (which makes good sense to me!) The NVSS showed that the effective rms noise added to snapshot images, presumably due to the multitude of uncleaned background sources outside the primary beam, was about 300 microJy. The limit will scale with beam solid angle, so we can estimate the effective confusion for other configurations. And it will more or less scale with mean spectral index, so we can scale to other bands. Jim's measurement is appropriate for snapshots. For a long synthesis, the confusion level should drop dramatically, as the sidelobe levels of the synthesized beam decline. An estimate of this is wanting -- it's easy to do with UVSIM or UVCON -- I'll do this when I get a few spare minutes. For the sake of argument, let's assume that the rms sidelobe level of the beam for a long synthesis is 1/10 of that for the NVSS snapshot. I then get the following table for the rms confusion levels in microJy: Band Configuration -------------------------------------------- A B C D -------------------------------------------- P (327) .5 5 50 500 L .03 .3 3 30 S .005 .05 .5 5 C .001 .01 .1 1 X .0004 .004 .04 .4 U really small .005 .05 K,Ka,Q not a problem!
VLA Expansion Project Science
VLA Expansion Project Home Page