The purpose of this problem is to illustrate the use of the
Tully-Fisher relation for determining distances to galaxies, as
well as computing mass-to-light ratios.
- (a)
- After plug-and-play, we find
MB = -21.83
- (b)
- The distance modulus is
B - MB = 34.05 = 5 log d - 5
which gives a distance of 64.57 Mpc to NGC 2639.
- (c)
- The relation gives
log R25 = 1.4357
or R25 = 27.27 kpc.
- (d)
- The sky brightness (for example in one square arcsecond) is larger
by a factor of
Isky/I25 = 100.4(25-22) =
101.2 = 15.8
and thus you need to measure the galaxy light down to a level of
6% of the sky brightness.
- (e)
- Our mass is (remembering to convert km/s to m/s and kpc to m)
M = v2 R / G = 1.32 × 1042 kg
= 6.62 × 1011 Msun
- (f)
- The B magnitude of the Sun is
MB,sun = MV,sun + ( B - V ) = 4.83 + 0.64
= 5.47
ie. the Sun is fainter in the blue band relative to an A0 star which sets
the magnitude zero. Therefore
L / Lsun = 100.4(4.83 - MB)
= 1010.66 = 4.61 × 1010
for NGC 2639 in B.
- (g)
- The mass-to-light ratio is
M / L = 6.62 × 1011 Msun
/ 4.61 × 1010 Lsun =
14.36 Msun / Lsun
This ratio is consistent what that for normal spiral galaxies of 2 - 20
(ZGS p.419).
We compute the sums (using a handy calculator)
(di /
i2)
= 56.1082
and
i-2
= 3.5485
giving
davg = 56.1082 / 3.5485 = 15.81 Mpc
for our best estimate for the Virgo distance.
The uncertainty in our estimate is therefore
d =
3.5485-1/2 = 0.53 Mpc
thus
dVirgo = 15.81 ± 0.53 Mpc
is our sample weighted average Virgo distance.
The Hubble constant is given by
H0 = v / d = 1136 km/s / 15.81 Mpc = 71.85 km/s/Mpc.
Note that the uncertainty in our derived H0 is
H0
/ H0 =
d
/ d = 0.53 / 15.81 = 0.0335
(though this was not part of the question) and thus we have a 3.35%
uncertainty or
H0 = 71.9 ± 2.4 km/s/Mpc
keeping a reasonable number of digits.
Usually the systematic error in measurements will be greater than this
(for example: all methods are based on Cepheid distances in our galaxy).
After correction for 168 km/s infall toward Virgo, the recession
velocity is 1304 km/s giving
H0 = 82.5 ± 2.8 km/s/Mpc
which was a larger correction that the statistical uncertainty of our
distance measurement! Note the uncertainty scales with the Hubble constant,
since it is a ratio of the two numbers.
The Hubble time is then
1 / H0 = 1/82.5 s Mpc/km × 3.086 × 1019
km / Mpc = 3.74 × 1017 s = 11.85 Gyr
with again a 3.35% statistical uncertainty from the distance
tH = 11.85 ± 0.40 Gyr.
With a velocity dispersion of 666 km/s we get the virial mass of
Mvir = 1.54 × 1045 kg =
7.70 × 1014 Msun
rembering again to convert to MKS units.
To cross the diameter of the Virgo cluster
D = 3 Mpc × 3.086 × 1019 km/Mpc =
9.26 × 1019 km
at a velocity of 666 km/s would take
tcross = 1.39 × 1017 s = 4.4 Gyr
which is less than the Hubble time of 12 Gyr.
The Hubble velocity between opposite sides of the cluster is
vH = 3 Mpc × 82.5 km/s/Mpc = 248 km/s
which is 37% of the velocity dispersion of 666 km/s. Note that this
is the same fraction as crossing time compared to the Hubble time,
since this is the same calculation
vH /
r
= D H0 /
r
= (D/
r) /
(1/H0) = tcross / tH
as expected.
Using T = 7 × 107 K and R = 1.5 Mpc
- (a)
- The luminosity is given by
Lx =
( 4
R2 / 3 )
ff
= 1.5 × 1036 W
which gives
ff =
1.5 × 1036 W / 4.155 × 1068 m3
= 3.61 × 10-33 W/m3.
Substituting this in the formula for the free-free emissivity
ne = [ 3.61 × 10-33
/ 1.42 × 10-40 ]1/2
[ 7 × 107 ]-1/4
= 55.12 m-3
with everything in the appropriate units.
- (b)
- If the IGM gas is hydrogen, and it is fully ionized (which it is) the
hydrogen density will be equal to the electron density, so the mass density
in the IGM will be
= ne mH
= 9.206 × 10-26 kg m-3
so the IGM mass is
Migm = 9.206 × 10-26 kg m-3 ×
4.155 × 1068 m3 =
3.82 × 1043 kg = 1.91 × 1013
Msun.
- (c)
- Combining (b) and the results from problem 3, we get
Migm / Mvir =
1.91 × 1013 Msun/
7.70 × 1014 Msun
= 0.025
or 2.5% of the mass of the cluster is in the hot intergalactic medium.
- (d)
- The total mass-to-light ratio (using the virial mass) is
Mvir / L_V =
7.70 × 1014 Msun /
1.2 × 10^12 Lsun
= 642
which is a very high value (and typical of clusters of galaxies). Using
a spiral galaxy mass-to-light ratio (see Problem Set 7) of 10, we infer
Mgal ~ 10 L_V = 1.2 × 1013 Msun
which is 63% of the IGM gas mass. In more massive clusters than Virgo,
like Coma, the galaxies contribute and even smaller fraction of the
visible mass.
- (e)
- The hot electrons and protons form a gas, with an energy density of
uigm = 3 nigm k T / 2 = 3 ne k T
assuming the electrons and protons have the same energy. Then
uigm = 1.60 × 10-13 J m-3
which if it emits at the rate given in (a) will lose all its energy in
a time
tcool = uigm /
ff
= 1.60 × 10-13 J m-3 /
3.61 × 10-33 W m-3 =
4.43 × 1019 s = 1.4 × 1012 yrs
which is much longer than the Hubble time.
We calculate the Eddington luminosity
LEd = 4
G M c /
= 1.26 × 1031 W ·
( M / Msun )
using the electron scattering (Thomson) opacity. In terms of solar
luminosities
LEd = 3.28 × 104 Lsun ·
( M / Msun )
and thus 108 Msun gives 3.3 × 1012 Lsun
( 1.26 × 1039 W ), which
is in the range of quasar luminosities.
Each kilogram of matter brought from "infinity" to a radius of q
Schwarzschild radii will give up the change in gravitational energy
(which is zero at R of infinity)
Ugr/m = G M / R = G M / ( q · 2GM/c2 )
= c2 / 2q
and thus delivers an appreciable fraction of its rest-mass energy
mc2! For q=3, we get c2/6 per kg, or 1.5 ×
1016 J/kg. Thus, to maintain the Eddington luminosity we
calcluated above, we need to accrete mass at the rate
dm/dt = dM/dt = LEd / (Ugr/m) =
( 1.26 × 1039 J/s ) / ( 1.5 × 1016 J/kg )
= 8.4 × 1022 kg/s
or
dM/dt = ( 8.4 × 1022 kg/s) ·
( 3.156 × 107 s/yr ) /
( 2 × 1030 kg/Msun ) = 1.33 Msun/yr
and thus our black hole just has to munch on a star every year or so
(or one big star every few years)!